Re: [b] --This is interesting

["Subintellectual" <subint00@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

But if all you're doing is calling the original poster a wanker, context is 
far less important isn't it?

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John Walker" <johnw@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, October 01, 2004 1:32 AM
Subject: Re: [b] --This is interesting


> Sam Jones wrote:
>
> > > Sorry for the top posting
>
> > Don't submit to Him, you fool.  Punch Him in the face.
>
> I seem to remember some sort of epic battle a few years back, in which the 
> bottom-posters won.
>
> There was lots of linking to huge long essays on why bottom posting was 
> best.
>
> And anyway, it only makes sense - we read from top to bottom, expecting 
> events to occur in that order. It's just lazy and rude to top post, and 
> makes deciphering the rubbish being written more of a chore than it 
> usually is.
>
> And you smell.
>
> And I'm Lord Bemli, so you have to do what I say.
>
> John
>
>
> ---
>
> "Steve Wilkinson is excellent and should have his own television show"


---

"Steve Wilkinson is excellent and should have his own television show"


* Last Subject: Re: [b] --bbc2 Bankrupt, Ray Gosling --*
* Last Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 09:53:51 +0000 --*
* 10:33-33 --*