Re: [b] -- Flight 93

[bloch@xxxxxxxxxxxx]

On Sun, 01 Oct 2006, Martin Coxall wrote:

> >
> >
> >I wonder where they got that idea.
> >
> >And a genius reviews it like this:
> >
> >"I think it should have been banned to be honest, because they are  
> >making money out of what happened. As they haven't banned it, I  
> >thought I may as well watch it. On the other hand I think they  
> >should continue to show it as it shows how slow the US government  
> >were to take any action. Disturbing, haunting, terrifying, this  
> >film is not the film to watch if you have nightmare's or phobias  
> >about aeroplanes. It is not a documentary, it is a film that  
> >reconstructs what happened to United Flight 93 on September 11th.  
> >Being extremely upset and tearful was only a fraction of what I  
> >felt whilst watching this film. It was reconstructed extremely  
> >well, although one can not even begin to imagine everything those  
> >poor people went through, by using evidence from various sources  
> >the film helps us to see and understand what went on from the  
> >evidence they have."
> 
> Hmm. Somebody was trying to be 'well funny'. Has the ring of George  
> about it actually. But we all know he can't watch anything longer  
> than 44 minutes without imploding.
> 
> Martin
> 

Wasn't there a "TV Movie" about that flight a couple of years ago?


---

Do you lot ever talk about anything else?


* Last Subject: Re: [b] -- Flight 93 --*
* Last Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 10:49:50 +0100 --*
* 10:3-3 --*