Re: [b] -- Beer, beer we want more beer.

[John Walker <johnw@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Tuesday 04 September 2001 01:45, Tom wrote:

> But you stated it was 'a fact'. You're using my argument to attack me.

Why is it such an issue to state something as a fact? So what? I'm not your 
leader, whom you must agree with. I'm an annoying, provocative tit on a 
mailing list. If I state something as a fact, nobody dies, no planes fall out 
of the sky, and the bunny rabbits are fine. And that's a fact.

> I'm already getting tired of saying this, but you perservered, so shall I.
> You're statement of fact, may aswell have been based on Mrs G's
> experiences, for they would have been at least as fact filled as yours.

I do rather feel that it is unfair to tell me you are tired of saying it, 
from having said it in the same mail before. I'm not sure how I was supposed 
to interrupt you half way through your mail.

My fact was wrong! I'm allowed to do that!

> >So in my experience, my statement is true.
>
> No it's still not a "fact".

But fact into doubt won't go.

> What accusations have I made against you? (Other than that you didn't know
> what you were talking about, which you now seem to agree with).

You accused me of being a car. And said that I wasn't pretty enough.

> No, you're right. We've been to gentle with you.

Where is this gentle?

John


 bit selfish i should be a fishmonger a h ha ha hah ha 


* Last Subject: Re: [b] -- No double entendre intended --*
* Last Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2001 01:48:57 +0100 --*
* 09:303-41 --*